Hunting Unicorns? Experimental Evidence on Predatory Pricing Policies
Armin Schmutzler,
Aaron Edlin,
Catherine Roux and
Christian Thoeni
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Christian Thöni
No 12125, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research
Abstract:
We study the anti-competitive effects of predatory pricing and the efficacy of three policy responses. In a series of experiments where an incumbent and a potential entrant interact, we compare prices, market structures and welfare. Under a laissez-faire regime, the threat of post-entry price cuts discourages entry, and allows incumbents to charge monopoly prices. Current U.S. policy (Brooke Group) does not help. A policy suggested by Baumol (1979) lowers post-exit prices, while Edlin’s (2002) proposal reduces pre-entry prices and encourages entry. While both policies show outcomes after entry that are less competitive than under Laissez-Faire, they nevertheless increase consumer welfare.
Keywords: Predatory pricing; Entry deterrence; Firm strategy; Antitrust law; Experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D21 K21 L12 L13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-exp and nep-mkt
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP12125 (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Hunting unicorns? Experimental evidence on predatory pricing policies (2017) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12125
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP12125
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().