The Political Economy of Mass Privatization and the Risk of Expropriation

Klaus Schmidt ()

No 1542, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: The privatization process in Eastern Europe is not irreversible. Future governments may want to expropriate successful private firms by increasing taxation or by renationalizing them in order to subsidize unsuccessful firms. The paper uses a simple median voter model to predict the policy of future governments. It is shown that there will be less expropriation the more shares are distributed free to the population. It is better to distribute shares equally across the population rather than to give them to insiders of each firm. Furthermore, people should be discouraged from selling their shares for cash. The threat of expropriation adversely affects investment and restructuring efforts. It is shown that a mass privatization scheme which includes substantial free distribution of shares may induce more investment, higher expected profits and higher privatization revenues for the government than a policy that relies exclusively on selling shares to the highest bidder.

Keywords: Expropriation; Mass Privatization; Political Economy; Transition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 L33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=1542 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Journal Article: The political economy of mass privatization and the risk of expropriation (2000)
Working Paper: The political economy of mass privatization and the risk of expropriation (2000)
Working Paper: The Political Economy of Mass Privatization and the Risk of Expropriation (1998)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1542

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... ers/dp.php?dpno=1542

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().