Too-big-to-strand? Bond versus bank financing in the transition to a low-carbon economy
Steven Ongena,
Winta Beyene,
Manthos Delis () and
Kathrin De Greiff
No 16692, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
Abstract:
What is the role market- and bank-based debt play in the climate transition process? We present evidence that bond markets price the risk that assets held by fossil fuel firms strand, while banks in the syndicated loan market seemingly do not price this risk much. Consequently, to fulfill their financing needs fossil fuel firms increasingly rely less on bonds and more on loans. We can interpret the within-firm bond-to-loan substitution along stranding risk as a contraction in the supply of bond versus bank funding. Within the banking sector especially the big banks are willing to provide cheaper and more financing to fossil fuel firms.
Keywords: Climate policy risk; Financial intermediation; Stranded assets; Credit misallocation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16692 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
Related works:
Working Paper: Too-big-to-strand? Bond versus bank financing in the transition to a low-carbon economy (2024) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16692
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16692
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().