Too-big-to-strand? Bond versus bank financing in the transition to a low-carbon economy

Steven Ongena, Winta Beyene, Manthos Delis and Kathrin De Greiff

No 16692, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: What is the role market- and bank-based debt play in the climate transition process? We present evidence that bond markets price the risk that assets held by fossil fuel firms strand, while banks in the syndicated loan market seemingly do not price this risk much. Consequently, to fulfill their financing needs fossil fuel firms increasingly rely less on bonds and more on loans. We can interpret the within-firm bond-to-loan substitution along stranding risk as a contraction in the supply of bond versus bank funding. Within the banking sector especially the big banks are willing to provide cheaper and more financing to fossil fuel firms.

Keywords: Climate policy risk; Financial intermediation; Stranded assets; Credit misallocation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16692 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Too-big-to-strand? Bond versus bank financing in the transition to a low-carbon economy (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16692

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16692

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().