The Geography of Investor Attention
Marco Pagano,
Stefano Mengoli and
Pierpaolo Pattitoni
No 16747, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research
Abstract:
Retail investors pay over twice as much attention to local companies than non-local ones, based on Google searches. News volume and volatility amplify this attention gap. Attention appears causally related to perceived proximity: first, acquisition by a nonlocal company is associated with less attention by locals, and more by nonlocals close to the acquirer; second, COVID-19 travel restrictions correlate with a drop in relative attention to nonlocal companies, especially in locations with fewer flights after the outbreak. Finally, local attention predicts volatility, bid-ask spreads and nonlocal attention, not viceversa. These findings are consistent with local investors having an information-processing advantage.
Keywords: Attention; Retail investors; Local investors; Distance; News; Liquidity; Volatility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 G11 G12 G14 G50 L86 R32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16747 (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: The Geography of Investor Attention (2025) 
Working Paper: The Geography of Investor Attention (2024) 
Working Paper: The Geography of Investor Attention (2021) 
Working Paper: The geography of investor attention (2021) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16747
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16747
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().