Fact-checking Politicians

Andrea Mattozzi, Samuel Nocito and Francesco Sobbrio

No 17710, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: We study the reaction of national politicians to a rigorous fact-checking of their public statements. Our research design relies on a novel randomized field experiment in collaboration with a leading fact-checking company. Our results show that politicians are responsive to negative fact- checking. We observe a reduction in the number of incorrect statements made by politicians after being treated in the order of one fourth of a standard deviation. This effect persists for at least two months. We also observe a reduction in the probability of politicians making verifiable statements, suggesting that fact-checking may also increase the ambiguity of politicians’ statements.

Keywords: Politicians; Accountability; Ambiguity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 D78 D8 D91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP17710 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Working Paper: Fact-checking Politicians (2024)
Working Paper: Fact-Checking Politicians (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17710

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP17710

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().