Should history change the way we think about populism?

Alan de Bromhead and Kevin O'Rourke

No 18079, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: This paper asks whether history should change the way in which economists and economic historians think about populism. We use Müller’s definition, according to which populism is ‘an exclusionary form of identity politics, which is why it poses a threat to democracy’. We make three historical arguments. First, late 19th century US Populists were not populist. Second, there is no necessary relationship between populism and anti-globalization sentiment. Third, economists have sometimes been on the wrong side of important policy debates involving opponents rightly or wrongly described as populist. History encourages us to avoid an overly simplistic view of populism and its correlates.

JEL-codes: D72 N40 N70 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18079 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Should history change the way we think about populism? (2024)
Working Paper: Should History Change The Way We Think About Populism? (2023)
Working Paper: Should history change the way we think about populism? (2023)
Working Paper: Should history change the way we think about populism? (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18079

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18079

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().