An Evaluation of Protected Area Policies in the European Union
Tristan Earle Grupp,
Prakash Mishra,
Mathias Reynaert and
Arthur van Benthem
No 18656, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
Abstract:
The European Union designates 26% of its landmass as a protected area, limiting economic development to favor biodiversity. This paper uses the staggered introduction of protected-area policies between 1985 and 2020 to study the selection of land for protection and the causal effect of protection on vegetation cover and nightlights. Our results reveal protection did not affect the outcomes in any meaningful way across four decades, all countries, protection cohorts, and a wide range of land and climate attributes. We conclude that European conservation efforts lack ambition because policymakers select land for protection not threatened by development.
Date: 2023-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18656 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
Related works:
Working Paper: An Evaluation of Protected Area Policies in the European Union (2024) 
Working Paper: An Evaluation of Protected Area Policies in the European Union (2023) 
Working Paper: An Evaluation of Protected Area Policies in the European Union (2023) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18656
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18656
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().