Cash or care? Insights from the German long-term care system

Iris Kesternich, Romahn, André, Johannes Van Biesebroeck and Marjolein Van Damme

No 20199, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: The German universal long-term care (LTC) insurance program offers beneficiaries the choice between in-kind services and a cash benefit, which can be used for anything, including informal care. The optimal level of the cash benefit depends on substitution between formal and informal care options, the cost of public funds, and distributional considerations. To evaluate various policy options, we estimate a random-coefficients demand model for the period 1999-2015 using data on the universe of LTC patients supplemented with micro moments from the German Mikrozensus. Results show strong heterogeneity in patient preferences for the three different LTC options: informal, ambulatory and stationary care. A counterfactual analysis predicts that abolishing the cash subsidy leads to a decline in patient surplus that far outweighs the savings in public expenditure. It suggests that many countries could benefit from the introduction of a cash subsidy option for LTC.

Keywords: Aging (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20199 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20199

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20199

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().