Shaping Social Norms: How Experience Affects Moral Judgments

Roberto Galbiati, Emeric Henry and Nicolas Jacquemet

No 20355, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: What actions other people judge appropriate drives pro-social behavior. We show that such judgments depend on whether the observers previously faced the situation they judge (active observers) or not (passive observers). In an online giving experiment, active observers make more polarized judgments than passive ones — those who acted pro-socially judge selfish behavior more harshly and praise pro-social actions more. Moreover, active observers persistently avoid payoff-relevant information, both as dictators, likely to maintain their self-image, and then as observers. Our results imply a new link between descriptive (what most people do) and injunctive norms (what groups deem appropriate).

Keywords: Injunctive; norms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C90 D64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20355 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Shaping Social Norms: How Experience Affects Moral Judgments (2025)
Working Paper: Shaping Social Norms: How Experience Affects Moral Judgments (2025)
Working Paper: Shaping Social Norms: How Experience Affects Moral Judgments (2025)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20355

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP20355

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().