EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Damages and Injunctions in Protecting Proprietary Research Tools

Mark Schankerman and Suzanne Scotchmer

No 2554, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: We investigate how liability rules and property rules affect the incentives to invest in research tools. We argue that it is hard to deter infringement under any of the enforcement regimes available. However, counterintuitively, a credible threat of infringement can actually be beneficial to the patentholder. We compare the two doctrines of damages under the liability rule, namely, lost profit (lost royalty) and unjust enrichment, and argue that unjust enrichment protects the patentholder better than lost royalty. Both can be superior to a property rule (the right to enjoin infringement), depending on how much delay is permitted before infringement is enjoined. We also show that, for patents on end-user products, the ranking of liability doctrines is reversed: unjust enrichment is inferior to lost profits.

Keywords: Intellectual property; Damages; Injunctions; Research tools (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2000-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP2554 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Working Paper: Damages and Injunctions in Protecting Proprietary Research Tools (2001) Downloads
Working Paper: Damages and Injunctions in Protecting Proprietary Research Tools (2000) Downloads
Working Paper: Damages and injunctions in protecting proprietary research tools (2000) Downloads
Working Paper: Damages and Injunctions in Protecting Proprietary Research Tools (2000) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:2554

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP2554

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:2554