Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects

Paul Klemperer and Joseph Farrell ()

No 5798, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: Switching costs and network effects bind customers to vendors if products are incompatible, locking customers or even markets in to early choices. Lock-in hinders customers from changing suppliers in response to (predictable or unpredictable) changes in efficiency, and gives vendors lucrative ex post market power - over the same buyer in the case of switching costs (or brand loyalty), or over others with network effects. Firms compete ex ante for this ex post power, using penetration pricing, introductory offers, and price wars. Such 'competition for the market' or 'life-cycle competition' can adequately replace ordinary compatible competition, and can even be fiercer than compatible competition by weakening differentiation. More often, however, incompatible competition not only involves direct efficiency losses but also softens competition and magnifies incumbency advantages. With network effects, established firms have little incentive to offer better deals when buyers? and complementors? expectations hinge on non-efficiency factors (especially history such as past market shares), and although competition between incompatible networks is initially unstable and sensitive to competitive offers and random events, it later 'tips' to monopoly, after which entry is hard, often even too hard given incompatibility. And while switching costs can encourage small-scale entry, they discourage sellers from raiding one another?s existing customers, and so also discourage more aggressive entry. Because of these competitive effects, even inefficient incompatible competition is often more profitable than compatible competition, especially for dominant firms with installed-base or expectational advantages. Thus firms probably seek incompatibility too often. We therefore favour thoughtfully pro-compatibility public policy.

Keywords: Switching costs; Network effects; Lock-in; Network externalities; Coordination; Indirect network effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-cse, nep-knm, nep-mic, nep-net and nep-tid
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (54)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP5798 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Chapter: Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects (2007)
Working Paper: Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects (2006)
Working Paper: Co-ordination and Lock-in: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5798

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP5798

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().