EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Environmental negotiations as dynamic games: Why so selfish ?

Raouf Boucekkine (), Jacek Krawczyk () and Thomas Vallee

No 2009009, LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES from Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES)

Abstract: We study a trade-off between economic and environmental indicators using a two-stage optimal control setting where the player can switch to a cleaner technology, that is environmentally “efficient”, but economically less productive. We provide an analytical characterization of the solution paths for the case where the considered utility functions are increasing and strictly concave with respect to consumption and decreasing linearly with respect to the pollution stock. In this context, an isolated player will either immediately start using the environmentally efficient technology, or for ever continue applying the old and “dirty” technology. In a two-player (say, two neighbor countries) dynamic game where the pollution results from a sum of two consumptions, we prove existence of a Nash (open-loop) equilibrium, in which each player chooses the technology selfish i.e., without considering the choice made by the other player. A Stackelberg game solution displays the same properties. Under cooperation, the country reluctant to adopt the technology as an equilibrium solution, chooses to switch to the cleaner technology provided it benefits from some “transfer” from the environmentally efficient partner

Keywords: Pollution; technology adoption; optimal control; dynamic games (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O41 Q56 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 25
Date: 2009-04-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://sites.uclouvain.be/econ/DP/IRES/2009009.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Environmental negotiations as dynamic games: Why so selfish? (2009) Downloads
Working Paper: Environmental negotiations as dynamic games: Why so selfish? (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ctl:louvir:2009009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES from Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) Place Montesquieu 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Virginie LEBLANC ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:ctl:louvir:2009009