Environmental negotiations as dynamic games: Why so selfish?
Raouf Boucekkine (raouf.boucekkine@univ-amu.fr),
Jacek Krawczyk (jacekbkrawczyk@gmail.com) and
Thomas Vallee
Working Papers from Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow
Abstract:
We study a trade-off between economic and environmental indicators using a two-stage optimal control setting where the player can switch to a cleaner technology, that is environmentally “efficient”, but economically less productive. We provide an analytical characterization of the solution paths for the case where the considered utility functions are increasing and strictly concave with respect to consumption and decreasing linearly with respect to the pollution stock. In this context, an isolated player will either immediately start using the environmentally efficient technology, or for ever continue applying the old and “dirty” technology. In a two-player (say, two neighbor countries) dynamic game where the pollution results from a sum of two consumptions, we prove existence of a Nash (open-loop) equilibrium, in which each player chooses the technology selfishly i.e., without considering the choice made by the other player. A Stackelberg game solution displays the same properties. Under cooperation, the country reluctant to adopt the technology as an equilibrium solution, chooses to switch to the cleaner technology provided it benefits from some “transfer” from the environmentally efficient partner.
Keywords: Pollution; technology adoption; optimal control; dynamic games (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O41 Q56 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_109401_en.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Environmental negotiations as dynamic games: Why so selfish? (2009) 
Working Paper: Environmental negotiations as dynamic games: Why so selfish ? (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gla:glaewp:2009_07
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Business School Research Team (business-school-research@glasgow.ac.uk).