Corruption and Cheating: Evidence from Rural Thailand
Olaf Hübler (),
Lukas Menkhoff and
No 1917, Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin from DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research
This study tests the prediction that perceived corruption reduces ethical behavior. Integrating a standard “cheating” experiment into a broad household survey in rural Thailand, we find clear support for this prediction: respondents who perceive corruption in state affairs are more likely to cheat and, thus, to fortify the negative consequences of corruption. Interestingly, there is a small group of non-conformers. The main relation is robust to consideration of socio-demographic, attitudinal, and situational control variables. Attendance of others at the cheating experiment, stimulating the reputational concern to be seen as honest, reduces cheating, thus indicating transparency as a remedy.
Keywords: Corruption; cheating; individual characteristics; lab-in-the-field experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D73 D91 O12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 42 p.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev, nep-exp and nep-sea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Corruption and cheating: Evidence from rural Thailand (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp1917
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin from DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bibliothek ().