Incentives to learn

Michael Kremer, Edward Miguel and Rebecca Thornton

Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website

Abstract: We report results from a randomized evaluation of a merit scholarship program for adolescent girls in Kenya. Girls who scored well on academic exams had their school fees paid and received a cash grant for school supplies. Girls eligible for the scholarship showed significant gains in academic exam scores (average gain 0.12-0.19 standard deviations) and these gains persisted following the competition. There is also evidence of positive program externalities on learning: boys, who were ineligible for the awards, also showed sizeable average test gains, as did girls with low pretest scores, who were unlikely to win. Both student and teacher school attendance increased in the program schools. We discuss implications both for understanding the nature of educational production functions and for the policy debate surrounding merit scholarships.

Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00289.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: Incentives to Learn (2009)
Working Paper: Incentives to Learn (2009)
Working Paper: Incentives to learn (2005)
Working Paper: Incentives to Learn (2004)
Working Paper: Incentives to Learn (2004)
Working Paper: Incentives to Learn (2004)
Working Paper: Incentives to Learn (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:feb:natura:00289

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesca Pagnotta ().