The adverse consequences of tournaments: Evidence from a field experiment
Maria De Paola (),
Francesca Gioia () and
Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
We ran a field experiment to investigate whether competing in rank-order tournaments with different prize spreads affects individual performance. Our experiment involved students from an Italian University who took an exam that was partly evaluated on the basis of relative performance. Students were matched in pairs on the basis of their high school grades and each pair was randomly assigned to one of three different tournaments. Random assignment neutralizes selection effects and allows us to investigate if larger prize spreads increase individual effort. We do not find any positive effect of larger prizes on performance. Furthermore, we show that the effect of prize spreads on students' performance depends on their degree of risk-aversion: competing in tournaments with large spreads negatively affects the performance of risk-averse students, while it does not produce any effect on students who are more prone to taking risks.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: The adverse consequences of tournaments: Evidence from a field experiment (2018)
Working Paper: THE ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF TOURNAMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM A FIELD EXPERIMENT (2016)
Working Paper: The Adverse Consequences of Tournaments: Evidence from a Field Experiment (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:feb:natura:00705
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joe Seidel ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).