Why has the cyclicality of productivity changed?: what does it mean?
John Fernald () and
J. Christina Wang
No 15-6, Current Policy Perspectives from Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Historically, U.S. labor productivity (output per hour) and total factor productivity (TFP) rose in booms and fell in recessions. Different models of business cycles explain this procyclicality differently. Traditional Keynesian models relied on \\"factor hoarding,\\" that is, variations in how intensively labor and capital were utilized over the business cycle. Real business cycle (RBC) models instead posit that procyclical technology shocks drive the business cycle. Since the mid-1980s, however, the procyclicality of productivity has waned. TFP has been roughly acyclical with respect to inputs, whereas labor productivity has become significantly countercyclical. The slow pace of productivity growth after 2010, when the post-Great- Recession recovery gained a firm footing, is broadly consistent with these patterns. In this paper, the authors seek to understand empirically the forces behind the changing cyclicality of productivity.
Keywords: growth-accounting; business cycles; procyclical productivity; labor hoarding; DSGE models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E32 O47 E23 E22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 53 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-dge, nep-eff and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/current-policy-perspectives/2015/cpp1506.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Why Has the Cyclicality of Productivity Changed? What Does It Mean? (2016)
Working Paper: Why has the cyclicality of productivity changed? What does it mean? (2016)
Working Paper: Why Has the Cyclicality of Productivity Changed? What Does It Mean? (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedbcq:2015_006
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Current Policy Perspectives from Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().