EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Why Has the Cyclicality of Productivity Changed? What Does It Mean?

John Fernald () and J. Christina Wang

Annual Review of Economics, 2016, vol. 8, issue 1, 465-496

Abstract: US labor and total factor productivity have historically been procyclical—rising in booms and falling in recessions. After the mid-1980s, however, total factor productivity became much less procyclical with respect to hours while labor productivity turned strongly countercyclical. We find that the key empirical “fact” driving these changes is reduced variation in factor utilization—conceptually, the workweek of capital and labor effort. We discuss a range of theories that seek to explain the changes in productivity's cyclicality. Increased flexibility, changes in the structure of the economy, and shifts in relative variances of technology and “demand” shocks all play key roles.

Keywords: procyclical productivity; labor hoarding; business cycles; growth accounting; DSGE models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E22 E23 E32 O47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (69)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018 (application/pdf)
Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.

Related works:
Working Paper: Why has the cyclicality of productivity changed? What does it mean? (2016) Downloads
Working Paper: Why Has the Cyclicality of Productivity Changed? What Does It Mean? (2016) Downloads
Working Paper: Why has the cyclicality of productivity changed?: what does it mean? (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:anr:reveco:v:8:y:2016:p:465-496

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.annualreviews.org/action/ecommerce

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Annual Review of Economics from Annual Reviews Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by http://www.annualreviews.org ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:anr:reveco:v:8:y:2016:p:465-496