Rationally Inattentive Consumer: An Experiment
Andrea Civelli (),
Justin D. LeBlanc and
Antonella Tutino ()
No 1813, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
This paper presents a laboratory experiment that directly tests the theoretical predictions of consumption choices under rational inattention. Subjects are asked to select consumption when income is random. They can optimally decide to reduce uncertainty about income by acquiring signals about it. The informativeness of the signals directly relates to the cognitive effort required to process the information. We find that subjects? behavior is largely in line with the predictions of the theory: 1) Subjects optimally make stochastic consumption choices; 2) They respond to incentives and changes in the economic environment by varying their attention and consumption; 3) They respond asymmetrically to positive and negative shocks to income, with negative shocks triggering stronger and faster reactions than positive shocks.
Keywords: Rational Inattention; Experimental Evidence; Information Processing Capacity; Consumption (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D11 D8 E20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp, nep-mac and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.dallasfed.org/-/media/documents/research/papers/2018/wp1813.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:feddwp:1813
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().