Are branch banks better survivors? Evidence from the Depression era

Mark Carlson

No 2001-51, Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.)

Abstract: It is widely argued in the literature on the Great Depression that the prevalence of unit banks aggravated the problem of financial instability that afflicted the country. This paper tests the theory that more widespread branch banking would have reduced financial turbulence in the United States by examining the survival of individual branch and unit banks. Results indicate that instead of being more likely to survive, branch banks were more likely to fail. Further investigation suggests that this higher failure rate occurred because branch banks systematically held riskier portfolios than unit banks.

Keywords: Branch banks; Financial crises (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ifn and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2001/200151/200151abs.html (text/html)
http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2001/200151/200151pap.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Are Branch Banks Better Survivors? Evidence from the Depression Era (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2001-51

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ryan Wolfslayer ; Keisha Fournillier ().