Transparency and Collateral: Central versus Bilateral Clearing
Gaetano Antinolfi (),
Francesca Carapella and
No 2018-017, Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US)
Bilateral financial contracts typically require an assessment of counterparty risk. Central clearing of these financial contracts allows market participants to mutualize their counterparty risk, but this insurance may weaken incentives to acquire and to reveal information about such risk. When considering this trade-off, participants would choose central clearing if information acquisition is incentive compatible. If it is not, they may prefer bilateral clearing, when this choice prevents strategic default while economizing on costly collateral. In either case, participants independently choose the efficient clearing arrangement. Consequently, central clearing can be socially inefficient under certain circumstances. These results stand in contrast to those in Achary and Bisin (2014), who find that central clearing is always the optimal clearing arrangement.
Keywords: Central counterparties; Collateral; Limited commitment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G10 G14 G20 G23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2018-17
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.federalre ... /feds/fedsorder.html
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Finance and Economics Discussion Series from Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ryan Wolfslayer ().