Understanding Models and Model Bias with Gaussian Processes
Thomas Cook and
Nathan Palmer
No RWP 23-07, Research Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Abstract:
Despite growing interest in the use of complex models, such as machine learning (ML) models, for credit underwriting, ML models are difficult to interpret, and it is possible for them to learn relationships that yield de facto discrimination. How can we understand the behavior and potential biases of these models, especially if our access to the underlying model is limited? We argue that counterfactual reasoning is ideal for interpreting model behavior, and that Gaussian processes (GP) can provide approximate counterfactual reasoning while also incorporating uncertainty in the underlying model’s functional form. We illustrate with an exercise in which a simulated lender uses a biased machine model to decide credit terms. Comparing aggregate outcomes does not clearly reveal bias, but with a GP model we can estimate individual counterfactual outcomes. This approach can detect the bias in the lending model even when only a relatively small sample is available. To demonstrate the value of this approach for the more general task of model interpretability, we also show how the GP model’s estimates can be aggregated to recreate the partial density functions for the lending model.
Keywords: models; Gaussian process; model bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C10 C14 C18 C45 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33
Date: 2023-06-15
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-big and nep-cmp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.kansascityfed.org/Research%20Working%2 ... p23-07cookpalmer.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedkrw:97176
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
DOI: 10.18651/RWP2023-07
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Research Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Zach Kastens ().