EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are Women Better Bankers to the Poor? Evidence from Rural Microfinance Institutions

Valentina Hartarska (), Denis Nadolnyak and Roy Mersland

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) provide financial services to the poor and in many ways resemble both banks and non‐profit organizations. Many MFIs target women because more women than men are poor, especially in rural areas. Studies show that women manage money differently from men and have different leadership styles. Thus, in credit unions and financial firms, female and male managers achieve different results. In microfinance, gender diversity on the board of MFIs is beneficial, and loans authorized by female loan officers have lower default rates. Motivated by these findings, we ask whether MFIs with a female Chief Executive Officer (CEO) are more efficient at serving the poor without jeopardizing financial sustainability. We adapt the banking approach to managerial (in)efficiency to account for the outreach and sustainability goals of the MFIs, and evaluate whether MFIs' outreach efficiency differs by the gender of their respective CEOs. We estimate a stochastic frontier cost function using the Battese‐Coelli (1995) model and the "true" random effects estimators using panel data from over 250 MFIs. We find that MFIs with female CEOs have significantly higher outreach efficiency than MFIs with male CEOs. Similar results are found with a two‐step stochastic frontier approach. Overall, the results suggest that promoting gender diversity at the top levels of MFI management is likely to have both social and financial benefits.

Keywords: microfinance; microfinance institutions; gender and finance; outreach; efficiency; microfinance microfinance institutions gender and finance outreach efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05220870v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2014, 96 (5), pp.1291-1306. ⟨10.1093/ajae/aau061⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05220870v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Are Women Better Bankers to the Poor? Evidence from Rural Microfinance Institutions (2014) Downloads
Journal Article: Are Women Better Bankers to the Poor? Evidence from Rural Microfinance Institutions (2014) Downloads
Working Paper: Are Women Better Bankers to the Poor? Evidence from Rural Microfinance Institutions (2013) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05220870

DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aau061

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-12-13
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05220870