The Effect of Tracking Students by Ability into Different Schools: A Natural Experiment

Nina Guyon, Eric Maurin and Sandra McNally

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The tracking of pupils by ability into elite and nonelite schools represents a controversial policy in many countries. There is no consensus on how large the elite track should be and little agreement on the effects of any further increase in its size. This paper presents a natural experiment where the increase in the size of the elite track was followed by a significant improvement in average educational outcomes. This experiment provides a rare opportunity to isolate the overall effect of allowing entry to the elite track for a group that was previously only at the margin of being admitted.

Date: 2012-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (43)

Published in Journal of Human Resources, 2012, 47 (3), pp.684-721. ⟨10.3368/jhr.47.3.684⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: The Effect of Tracking Students by Ability into Different Schools: A Natural Experiment (2012)
Working Paper: The Effect of Tracking Students by Ability into Different Schools: A Natural Experiment (2012)
Working Paper: The Effect of Tracking Students by Ability into Different Schools: A Natural Experiment (2012)
Working Paper: The Effect of Tracking Students by Ability into Different Schools: a Natural Experiment (2010)
Working Paper: The Effect of Tracking Students by Ability into Different Schools: A Natural Experiment (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00754588

DOI: 10.3368/jhr.47.3.684

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().