Professors in Core Science Fields Are Not Always Biased against Women: Evidence from France

Thomas Breda () and Son Thierry Ly

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: We investigate the link between how male-dominated a field is, and gender bias against women in this field. Taking the entrance exam of a French higher education institution as a natural experiment, we find that evaluation is actually biased in favor of females in more male-dominated subjects (e.g., math, philosophy) and in favor of males in more female-dominated subjects (e.g., literature, biology), inducing a rebalancing of gender ratios between students recruited for research careers in science and humanities majors. Evaluation bias is identified from systematic variations across subjects in the gap between students' nonanonymous oral and anonymous written test scores.

Keywords: higher education institution; Woman (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (41)

Published in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2015, 7 (4), pp.53-75. ⟨10.1257/app.20140022⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Professors in Core Science Fields Are Not Always Biased against Women: Evidence from France (2015)
Working Paper: Professors in Core Science Fields Are Not Always Biased against Women: Evidence from France (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01307781

DOI: 10.1257/app.20140022

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().