Industrial Relations and Firms’ Reactions to the Recession: A Comparative Micro-Econometric Analysis of France and Great Britain

Relations sociales et ajustements à la crise: une analyse micro-statistique comparative franco-britannique

Thomas Amossé (), Philippe Askenazy, Martin Chevalier, Christine Erhel (), Héloïse Petit and Antoine Reberioux
Additional contact information
Thomas Amossé: CEET - Centre d'études de l'emploi et du travail - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - M.E.N.E.S.R. - Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche - Ministère du Travail, de l'Emploi et de la Santé
Martin Chevalier: ENSAE - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique - Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse Economique
Christine Erhel: CEET - Centre d'études de l'emploi et du travail - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - M.E.N.E.S.R. - Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche - Ministère du Travail, de l'Emploi et de la Santé, CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

PSE Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: This article analyses employment and wage adjustments within French and British establishments in reaction to the 2007-2008 downturn. We study how internal and external flexibility associate to industrial relations at the establishment level. Our analysis is based on the comparison of two separate but highly comparable surveys: the British WERS and the French REPONSE, both conducted in 2011-2012. The two economies are often described as opposites, in terms of labor market institutions or firm demography for instance. At the macro level, the form taken by the crisis and its consequences indeed appeared as quite different: Britain favored internal adjustment (with wage change) while France focused on external adjustment (through employment level). Yet, we show establishments that reacted to the crisis by adjusting employment or wages have similar industrial relations in both countries: other things being equal, union presence, negotiation, conflict and consultation are associated with more flexibility arrangements. It shows that in both countries unions were not an obstacle to establishment adjustments after the downturn, even if they may have contributed to mitigate them (which our data does not allow us to assess). Our results suggest that these differences between the two countries might have more to do with difference in macroeconomic policy, and especially monetary policy, rather than labormarket institutions: high inflation opened the way for veiled wage adjustment in Britain when very low inflation restricted such opportunity in France.

Keywords: ajustement de l’emploi; consultation; ajustement des salaires; relations sociales; syndicats; négociation; crise; flexibilité (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-06
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://cnam.hal.science/hal-02172455v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cnam.hal.science/hal-02172455v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Industrial Relations and Firms’ Reactions to the Recession: A Comparative Micro-Econometric Analysis of France and Great Britain (2016)
Working Paper: Industrial Relations and Firms’ Reactions to the Recession: A Comparative Micro-Econometric Analysis of France and Great Britain (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:psewpa:hal-02172455

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in PSE Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().