Star wars: The empirics strike back

Brodeur, Abel; Lé, Mathias; Sangnier, Marc; Zylberberg, Yanos

Star wars: The empirics strike back

Abel Brodeur, Mathias Lé, Marc Sangnier and Yanos Zylberberg

Abstract: Journals favor rejections of the null hypothesis. This selection upon results may distort the behavior of researchers. Using 50,000 tests published between 2005 and 2011 in the AER, JPE and QJE, we identify a residual in the distribution of tests that cannot be explained by selection. The distribution of p-values exhibits a camel shape with abundant p-values above :25, a valley between :25 and :10 and a bump slightly under :05. Missing tests are those which would have been accepted but close to being rejected (p-values between :25 and :10). We show that this pattern corresponds to a shift in the distribution of p-values: between 10% and 20% of marginally rejected tests are misallocated. Our interpretation is that researchers might be tempted to inflate the value of their tests by choosing the specification that provides the highest statistics. Note that Inflation is larger in articles where stars are used in order to highlight statistical significance and lower in articles with theoretical models.

Keywords: Hypothesis testing; Distorting incentives; Selection bias; Research in economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-06
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00710122v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00710122v1/document (application/pdf)

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00710122

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().