Are Bilateral Remittances Countercyclical?

Jeffrey Frankel

Scholarly Articles from Harvard Kennedy School of Government

Abstract: By putting together a relatively large data set on bilateral remittances of emigrants, this paper is able to shed light on the important hypothesis of smoothing. The smoothing hypothesis is that remittances are countercyclical with respect to income in the worker’s country of origin (the recipient of the remittance), while procyclical with respect to income in the migrant’s host country (the sender of the remittance). The econometric results confirm the hypothesis. This affirmation of smoothing is important for two reasons. First, it suggests that remittances should be placed on the list of criteria for an optimum currency area. Second, it brings into doubt plans by governments in some developing countries to harness remittances for their own use, in that government spending in these countries generally fails the test of countercyclicality which remittances pass.

Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (90)

Published in Open Economies Review

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/9642640/Frankel-AreBilateral.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Are Bilateral Remittances Countercyclical? (2011)
Working Paper: Are Bilateral Remittances Countercylical? (2010)
Working Paper: Are Bilateral Remittances Countercyclical? (2010)
Working Paper: Are Bilateral Remittances Countercyclical? (2009)
Working Paper: Are Bilateral Remittances Countercyclical? (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:hksfac:9642640

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard Kennedy School of Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().