Mental Representation of Sharing Experimets: Analyzing Choice and Belief Data

Werner Güth (), Charlotte Klempt and Kerstin Pull

No 118, IAW Discussion Papers from Institut für Angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung (IAW)

Abstract: We confront allocator participants with different sharing games in a within subjects design: the Nash demand game, the ultimatum game, the yes-no-game and the impunity game. We allow participants to opt out rather than play the game under consideration. Beside choice data we also collect belief data to learn more about the mental representations of sharing games.

Pages: 8 pages
Date: 2015-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-gth and nep-hpe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.iaw.edu/RePEc/iaw/pdf/iaw_dp_118.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Cognitively differentiating between sharing games: inferences from choice and belief data of proposer participants (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iaw:iawdip:118

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IAW Discussion Papers from Institut für Angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung (IAW) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Rolf Kleimann ().