Does the Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter?
Jonathan Ostry (),
Anne Marie Gulde,
Atish R. Ghosh and
Holger C. Wolf
No 1995/121, IMF Working Papers from International Monetary Fund
The effect of the exchange rate regime on inflation and growth is examined. The 30-year data set includes over 100 countries and nine regime types. Pegged regimes are associated with lower inflation than intermediate or flexible regimes. This anti-inflationary benefit reflects lower money supply growth (a discipline effect) and higher money demand growth (a credibility effect). Output growth does not vary significantly across regimes: Countries with pegged regimes invest more and are more open to international trade than those with flexible rates, but they experience lower residual productivity growth. Output and employment are more variable under pegged rates than under flexible rates.
Keywords: Exchange rate arrangements; Conventional peg; Inflation; Exchange rate flexibility; Exchange rates; WP,exchange rate regime,nominal exchange rate,money demand,central bank,growth rate (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden
Working Paper: Does the Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter? (1997)
Working Paper: Does The Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter? (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:imf:imfwpa:1995/121
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IMF Working Papers from International Monetary Fund International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC USA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Akshay Modi ().