Does the Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter?

Atish Ghosh (), Anne-Marie Gulde, Jonathan Ostry and Holger C. Wolf

No 5874, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: The relevance of the exchange rate regime for macroeconomic performance remains a key issue in international macroeconomics. We use a comprehensive dataset covering nine regime-types for one hundred forty countries over thirty years to examine the link between the regime, inflation, and growth. Two sturdy stylized facts emerge. First, inflation is both lower and more stable under pegged regimes, reflecting both slower money supply and faster money demand growth. Second, real volatility is higher under pegged regimes. In contrast, growth varies only slightly across regimes, though investment is somewhat higher and trade growth somewhat lower under pegged regimes. Pegged regimes are thus characterized by lower inflation but more pronounced output volatility.

JEL-codes: F33 F41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997-01
Note: IFM
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (338)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w5874.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Does The Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter? (1997)
Working Paper: Does the Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter? (1995)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:5874

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w5874

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().