Why Do We Procrastinate? Present Bias and Optimism
Zachary Breig (),
Matthew Gibson () and
Additional contact information
Zachary Breig: University of Queensland
No 13060, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
Research has shown that procrastination has signicant adverse effects on individuals, including lower savings and poorer health. Procrastination is typically modeled as resulting from present bias. In this paper we study an alternative: excessively optimistic beliefs about future demands on an individual's time. The models can be distinguished by how individuals respond to information on their past choices. Experimental results refute the hypothesis that present bias is the sole source of dynamic inconsistency, but they are consistent with optimism. These findings offer an explanation for low takeup of commitment and suggest that personalized information on past choices can mitigate procrastination.
Keywords: discounting; beliefs; dynamic inconsistency; real effort (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D90 D84 D15 J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 61 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-evo, nep-exp and nep-hea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Why Do We Procrastinate? Present Bias and Optimism (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13060
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().