Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (To Each Other)?
Jason Abrevaya and
Daniel Hamermesh ()
No 4921, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Using a very large sample of matched author-referee pairs, we examine how the gender of referees and authors affects the former's recommendations. Relying on changing matches of authors and referees, we find no evidence of gender differences among referees in charitableness toward authors; nor do we find any effect of the interaction between the referees’ and authors' gender. With substantial research showing gender differences in fairness, the results suggest that an ethos of objectivity can overcome tendencies toward same-group favoritism/opposite-group discrimination.
Keywords: academe; discrimination; gender (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab and nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in: Review of Economics and Statistics, 2012, 94 (1), 202-207
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (To Each Other)? (2012)
Working Paper: Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (to Each Other)? (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4921
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Mark Fallak ().