Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence

Stéphane Robin (), Agnieszka Rusinowska and Marie Claire Villeval

No 6530, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Abstract: We provide experimental evidence of workers' ingratiation by opinion conformity and of managers' discrimination in favor of workers with whom they share similar opinions. In our Baseline, managers can observe both workers' performance at a task and opinions before assigning unequal payoffs. In the Ingratiation treatment, workers can change their opinion after learning that held by the manager. In the Random treatment, workers can also change opinion but payoffs are assigned randomly, which gives a measure of non-strategic opinion conformism. We find evidence of high ingratiation indices, as overall, ingratiation is effective. Indeed, managers reward opinion conformity, and even more so when opinions cannot be manipulated. Additional treatments reveal that ingratiation is cost sensitive and that the introduction of performance pay for managers as well as a less noisy measure of performance increase the role of relative performance in the assignment of payoffs, without eliminating the reward of opinion conformity.

Keywords: social distance; ingratiation; opinion conformity; favoritism; discrimination; experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C7 C92 D03 D86 M51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 48 pages
Date: 2012-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-gth
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Published - revised version published in: European Economic Review, 2014, 66, 16-38.

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp6530.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012)
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012)
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012)
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012)
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012)
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6530

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().