Legitimacy of control

Wendelin Schnedler and Radovan Vadovic ()

No 07-61, Papers from Sonderforschungsbreich 504

Abstract: What is the motivational effect of imposing a minimum effort requirement? Agents may no longer exert voluntary effort but merely meet the requirement. Here, we examine how such hidden costs of control change when control is considered legitimate. We study a principal-agent model where control signals the expectations of the principal and the agent meets these expectations because he is guilt-averse. We conjecture that control is more likely to be considered legitimate (i) if it is not exclusively aimed at a specific agent or (ii) if it protects the endowment of the principal. Given the conjecture, the model predicts that hidden costs are lower when one of the two conditions is met. We experimentally test these predictions and find them confirmed.

Keywords: moral-hazard; intrinsic motivation; guilt-aversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C7 C9 M5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/2507/1/dp07_61.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: Legitimacy of Control (2011)
Working Paper: Legitimacy of Control (2007)
Working Paper: Legitimacy of Control (2007)
Working Paper: Legitimacy of Control (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mnh:spaper:2507

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from Sonderforschungsbreich 504 Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Katharina Rautenberg ().