Tax Policy and Education Policy: Collision or Coordination? A Case Study of the 529 and Coverdell Saving Incentives

Susan Dynarski

No 10357, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: 529 saving plans and Coverdell Educational Savings Accounts are marketed as attractive vehicles for college savings. The main finding of this paper is that college savings plans can actually harm some families. The joint treatment by the income tax code and financial aid system of college savings creates tax rates that exceed 100 percent for those families on the margin of receiving additional financial aid. Since even families with incomes above $100,000 receive need-based aid, the impact of these very high taxes is quite broad. I find that an aid-marginal family with funds in a Coverdell is worse off than if it did not save at all. Simulations show that $1,000 of pretax income placed in a Coverdell for a newborn and left to accumulate until college will face income and aid taxes that consume all of the principal, all of the earnings and an additional several hundred dollars. This perverse outcome is the product of poor coordination between the income tax code and the financial aid system.

JEL-codes: H21 I22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-pbe and nep-pub
Note: ED PE CH
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Published as Dynarski, Susan M. “Tax Policy and Education Policy: Coordination or Collision?” Tax Policy and the Economy 18 (2004).
Published as Tax Policy and Education Policy: Collision or Coordination? A Case Study of the 529 and Coverdell Saving Incentives , Susan Dynarski. in Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 18 , Poterba. 2004

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w10357.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Chapter: Tax Policy and Education Policy: Collision or Coordination? A Case Study of the 529 and Coverdell Saving Incentives (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10357

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w10357

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().