Are Business Cycles Symmetric?

J. Bradford De Long and Lawrence Summers
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: James Bradford DeLong ()

No 1444, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: This note shows that contrary to widespread belief there is little evidence that the business cycle is asymmetric. Using American data for the pre- and post-war periods and data on five other major OECD nations for the post-war period, we are unable to support the hypothesis that contractions are shorter and sharper than expansions. We conclude that there is not much basis for preferring some version of traditional cyclical techniques to more modern statistical methods.

Date: 1984-09
Note: EFG
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (53)

Published as "Are Business Cycles Symmetrical?" From The American Business Cycle: Con-tinuity and Change, edited by Robert J. Gordon, pp. 166-178. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (1986).

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w1444.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:1444

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w1444

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().