Low-quality Patents in the Eye of the Beholder: Evidence from Multiple Examiners
Gaétan de Rassenfosse,
William Griffiths (),
Adam Jaffe and
Elizabeth Webster ()
No 22244, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
A low-quality patent system threatens to slow the pace of technological progress. Concerns about low patent quality are supported by estimates from litigation studies suggesting that the majority of patents granted by the U.S. patent office should not have been issued. This paper proposes a new Bayesian method for measuring patent quality, based on twin patent applications granted at one office but refused at another office. Our method allows us to distinguish whether low-quality patents are issued because an office implements a (consistently) low standard, or because it violates its own standard. The results suggest that quality in patent systems is higher than previously thought. In particular, relative to the own standard of each office, the percentage of mistakenly granted patents is under 10 percent for all offices. The Japanese patent office has a greater percentage of mistakenly granted patents than those of Europe, the United States, Korea and China, largely because it has a higher standard.
JEL-codes: K41 L43 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ino, nep-ipr, nep-pr~ and nep-tid
Note: LE PR
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (28)
Published as Gaétan de Rassenfosse & William E. Griffiths & Adam B. Jaffe & Elizabeth Webster, 2021. "Low-Quality Patents in the Eye of the Beholder: Evidence from Multiple Examiners," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, vol 37(3), pages 607-636.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w22244.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Low-Quality Patents in the Eye of the Beholder: Evidence from Multiple Examiners (2021) 
Working Paper: Low-quality patents in the eye of the beholder: Evidence from multiple examiners (2019) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22244
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w22244
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().