Quicksand or Bedrock for Behavioral Economics? Assessing Foundational Empirical Questions
Joanne Yoong and
Jonathan Zinman ()
No 23625, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Behavioral economics lacks empirical evidence on some foundational empirical questions. We adapt standard elicitation methods to measure multiple behavioral factors per person in a representative U.S. sample, along with financial condition, cognitive skills, financial literacy, classical preferences and demographics. Individually, B-factors are prevalent, distinct from other decision inputs, and correlate negatively with financial outcomes in richly-conditioned regressions. Conditioning further on other B-factors does not change the results, validating common practice of modeling B-factors separately. Corrections for low task/survey effort modestly strengthen the results. Our findings provide bedrock empirical foundations for behavioral economics, and offer methodological guidance for research designs.
JEL-codes: D03 D14 D8 D9 E03 G02 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo, nep-exp, nep-hme and nep-upt
Note: AG AP DEV EEE EFG HE IO LE LS PE
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Quicksand or Bedrock for Behavioral Economics? Assessing Foundational Empirical Questions (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23625
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().