An Evaluation of Biases in Wellbeing Estimates Using Interviewers Versus Online Data Collection in the Global Flourishing Study

David G. Blanchflower, Alex Bryson and Alan J. Cui

No 34599, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Survey mode is a critical consideration in well-being research using the 22 country Global Flourishing Study (GFS). We find marked differences in responses to well-being questions if they are obtained via a telephone interviewer (CATI) or online (CAWI). In fifteen countries in the GFS both survey modes are used. In seven of the most advanced countries, only CAWI is used. Well-being responses are markedly different across survey modes within countries using both modes and compared to countries only using CAWI. On average, CATI tends to produce higher well-being scores. Failure to account for these sampling differences biases results. This is the case in twenty-three prior studies that used the GFS and took no account of survey mode. We examine each of these studies and show the findings differ by survey mode. Combined with the presence of other unobservable country-level confounders, the differences between survey modes substantively weakens the internal validity of cross-country comparisons and random effects meta-analysis conducted with the GFS.

JEL-codes: I3 I30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-12
Note: CH LS
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w34599.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34599

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w34599
The price is Paper copy available by mail.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().