Economic Damage of Cookie Lifetime Restrictions

Klaus Miller () and Bernd Skiera

No 17-02, Working Papers from NET Institute

Abstract: Over the past few years, regulators have begun to consider restricting a cookie’s lifetime or even banning cookies altogether as a way to protect consumer privacy. Most of this debate has taken place in the absence of any quantified cost-benefit analysis. To begin to fill this gap in the discourse, we estimate the potential economic damage of lifespan restrictions on cookies. Our analysis is based on an empirical study on cookies of 54,127 users who received about 130 million ad impressions over 2.5 years. Only 22% of all cookies increase their daily value over time but the value of that quantile represent 61% of the value of all cookies. This analysis suggests that restricting their lifetime to one year as the European Union proposes (two years as Google advocates) decreases cookie lifetime value by 14.8% (5.9%), which represents a decrease in the value of all cookies of about 7.4% (1.3%). Overall, we find that the average lifetime of a cookie is 215 days (median 68 days) and the average value of a cookie is €1.43 (median €.02).

Keywords: Cookie; Privacy; Online Advertising; Real-time Bidding; Value of Information; Consumer Protection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D18 L50 L86 M37 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 pages
Date: 2017-09
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.netinst.org/Miller_17-02.pdf (application/pdf)
no

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:net:wpaper:1702

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from NET Institute
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nicholas Economides ().