MetaArXiv
From Center for Open Science Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF (). Access Statistics for this working paper series.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.
- me2ub: The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science

- Lukas Röseler, Leonard Kaiser, Christopher Albert Doetsch, Noah Klett, Christian Seida, Astrid Schütz, Balazs Aczel, Nadia Adelina, Valeria Agostini and Samuel Alarie
- mbx62: Statistical reporting errors in economics

- Stephan Bruns, Helmut Herwartz, John P.A. Ioannidis, Chris-Gabriel Islam and Fabian H. C. Raters
- mbvz3: Which findings should be published?

- Maximilian Kasy and Alexander Frankel
- kvzg3: The Intuitive Cooperation Hypothesis Revisited: A Meta-analytic Examination of Effect-size and Between-study Heterogeneity

- Amanda Kvarven, Eirik Strømland, Conny Wollbrant, David Andersson, Magnus Johannesson, Gustav Tinghög, Daniel Västfjäll and Kristian Ove R. Myrseth
- kuhmz: The multiversal methodology as a remedy of the replication crisis

- Giulio Giacomo Cantone
- kqse5_v1: The Economic Impact of Open Science: A Scoping Review

- Lena Tsipouri, Sofia Liarti, Silvia Vignetti and Izabella Martins-Grapengiesser
- knjea: Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size

- Peder Mortvedt Isager, Anna Elisabeth van 't Veer and Daniel Lakens
- jt5zf: Likelihood Ratio Test for Publication Bias – a Proof of Concept

- Paweł Lenartowicz
- jnyqh: A Framework for Open Policy Analysis

- Fernando Hoces de la Guardia, Sean Grant and Edward Miguel
- jk7sa: Are Most Published Research Findings False In A Continuous Universe?

- Kleber Neves, Pedro Batista Tan and Olavo Bohrer Amaral
- j986q: To adjust or not to adjust: It is not the tests you perform that count, but how you report them

- Anne-Laure Boulesteix and Sabine Hoffmann
- j5nmf_v1: Identifying the Impact of Hypothetical Stakes on Experimental Outcomes and Treatment Effects

- Jack Fitzgerald
- hva4p: How to measure interdisciplinary research? A systematic, yet critical, review

- Giulio Giacomo Cantone
- hnefr: Meta-Analysis of Empirical Estimates of Loss-Aversion

- Alexander Brown, Taisuke Imai, Ferdinand Vieider and Colin Camerer
- hcjqm_v1: Role of ILSAs for Meta-Analyses in Education

- Ronny Scherer, Fazilat Siddiq and Trude Nilsen
- haf2v: Data science in economics: comprehensive review of advanced machine learning and deep learning methods

- Saeed Nosratabadi, Amir Mosavi, Puhong Duan, Pedram Ghamisi, Ferdinand Filip, Shahab S. Band, Uwe Reuter, Joao Gama and Amir H. Gandomi
- h9t5c_v1: Pre-Registered Analysis Plan: Is the Inter-Researcher Variability in Social Scientific Results Explicable? An Adversarial Collaboration and Joint Effort to Parse Model and Estimate Dispersion

- Nate Breznau, Katrin Auspurg, Josef Brüderl, Felix Holzmeister, Gustav Nilsonne, Balazs Aczel, Cory J Clark, Hung Hoang Viet Nguyen, Marton Aron Varga and Eric Luis Uhlmann
- h29xn_v1: Estimating the extent of inflated significance in economics

- Stephan Bruns, Teshome Kebede Deressa, T. Stanley, Chris Doucouliagos and John P.A. Ioannidis
- g94sx: Does Shareholder Activism Create Value? A Meta-Analysis

- Josef Bajzik, Tomas Havranek, Zuzana Irsova and Jiri Novak
- frta7: Statisticians roll up your sleeves! There’s a crisis to be solved

- Heidi Seibold, Alethea Charlton, Anne-Laure Boulesteix and Sabine Hoffmann
- f6y3x: The Dogmatic Mixture Model Overestimates False Positives

- Ulrich Schimmack and Jerry Brunner
- ewb2t: Predicting Replication Rates with Z-Curve: A Brief Exploratory Validation Study Using the Replication Database

- Lukas Röseler
- eqhjd: Dissertation R.C.M. van Aert

- Robbie Cornelis Maria van Aert
- epgjd: OSF Prereg Template

- Sara D. Bowman, Alexander Carl DeHaven, Timothy M. Errington, Tom Elis Hardwicke, David Thomas Mellor, Brian A. Nosek and Courtney K. Soderberg
- ekrqs_v1: Class Size and Student Achievement: A Modern Meta-Analysis

- Matej Opatrny, Tomas Havranek, Zuzana Irsova and Milan Ščasný
- e9nw2: Meta-regression to explain shrinkage and heterogeneity in large-scale replication projects

- Rachel Heyard and Leonhard Held
- e4pum: Pre-analysis Plans: A Stocktaking

- Aleksandar Bogdanoski, George Ofosu and Daniel N Posner
- dhc2e: Easy preregistration will benefit any research

- David Thomas Mellor and Brian A. Nosek
- dh87m: Identification of and Correction for Publication Bias: Comment

- Amanda Kvarven, Eirik Strømland and Magnus Johannesson
- dgshk: The role of results in deciding to publish

- Jasmine Muradchanian, Rink Hoekstra, Henk Kiers and Don van Ravenzwaaij
- d7sqr_v1: The Need for Equivalence Testing in Economics

- Jack Fitzgerald
- d6a8s: Redundant multiple testing corrections: The fallacy of using family-based error rates to make inferences about individual hypotheses

- Mark Rubin
- d5y26: On the Coherence of Composite Indexes: Multiversal Model and Specification Analysis for an Index of Well-Being

- Giulio Giacomo Cantone and Venera Tomaselli
- d5eud: Panel Data and Experimental Design

- Fiona Burlig, Louis Preonas and Matt Woerman
- cwftm_v1: Open Science in Impact Evaluation: What Impact Evaluators can Learn from the Replication Crisis in Social Psychology

- Ben McNamee, Patrick S. Forscher and Michael Lenczner
- cp65t: MEASUREMENT AND SOCIAL DESIRABILITY RESPONSE BIAS IN EXPERIMENTAL VIGNETTE RESARCH: A TEST OF FAZIO’S MODE THEORY

- John Dr. Stolte
- cnuh7: Data analysis planning and reporting for confirmatory multi-lab preclinical trials

- María Arroyo-Araujo, Clarissa França Dias Carneiro, Sophie K. Piper, Juliane C. Wilcke, Nicole Ellenbach, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Robbert Emprechtinger, Bernhard Haller, Benjamin V. Ineichen and Lars Björn Riecken
- cj7xf: Examining Psychological Science through Systematic Meta-Method Analysis: A Call for Research

- Malte Elson
- ceda3: Learning from comics versus non-comics material in education: Systematic review and meta-analysis

- Marianna Pagkratidou, Neil Cohn, Phivos Phylactou, Marietta Papadatou-Pastou and Gavin Duffy
- cd5j9: Observing Many Researchers using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Data Analysis

- Nate Breznau, Eike Mark Rinke, Alexander Wuttke, Muna Adem, Jule Adriaans, Amalia Alvarez-Benjumea, Henrik Kenneth Andersen, Daniel Auer, Flavio Azevedo and Oke Bahnsen
- c7qvn: Beauty and Professional Success: A Meta-Analysis

- Kseniya Bortnikova, Tomas Havranek and Zuzana Irsova
- c4ujg_v1: Assessing the potential of a Bayesian ranking as an alternative to consensus meetings for decision making in research funding: A Case Study of Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

- Rachel Heyard, David Pina, Ivan Buljan and Ana Marusic
- bthj7: Alternative personal data governance models

- Bastian Greshake Tzovaras and Mad Price Ball
- ba7tr: How Transparency and Reproducibility Can Increase Credibility in Policy Analysis: A Case Study of the Minimum Wage Policy Estimate

- Fernando Hoces de la Guardia
- b8uhe: Relative Risk Aversion: A Meta-Analysis

- Ali Elminejad, Tomas Havranek and Zuzana Irsova
- ax825: Evaluating meta-analysis as a replication success measure

- Jasmine Muradchanian, Rink Hoekstra, Henk Kiers and Don van Ravenzwaaij
- as9zd: Cherry Picking

- Megan Lang and Wenfeng Qiu
- aqyhg: Meta-Research: How problematic citing practices distort science

- Serge Horbach, Kaare Aagaard and Jesper W. Schneider
- apdxk: A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics

- Rachel Heyard, Samuel Pawel, Joris Frese, Bernhard Voelkl, Hanno Würbel, Sarah McCann, Leonhard Held, Kimberley E. PhD Wever, Helena Hartmann and Louise Townsin
- a9vhr: We Need to Talk about Mechanical Turk: What 22,989 Hypothesis Tests Tell Us about Publication Bias and p-Hacking in Online Experiments

- Abel Brodeur, Nikolai Cook and Anthony Heyes
| |