Men are from Mars, and women too: a Bayesian meta-analysis of overconfidence experiments

Oriana Bandiera, Nidhi Parekh, Barbara Petrongolo and Michelle Rao

No 957, Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics

Abstract: Gender differences in self-confidence could explain women’s under representation in high-income occupations and glass-ceiling effects. We draw lessons from the economic literature via a survey of experts and a Bayesian hierarchical model that aggregates exper imental findings over the last twenty years. The experts’ survey indicates beliefs that men are overconfident and women under-confident. Yet, the literature reveals that both men and women are typically overconfident. Moreover, the model cannot reject the hypothe sis that gender differences in self-confidence are equal to zero. In addition, the estimated pooling factor is low, implying that each study contains little information over a common phenomenon. The discordance can be reconciled if the experts overestimate the pooling factor or have priors that are biased and precise.

Date: 2021-12-16
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gen and nep-neu
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3fe630c5-c452-4fa4-9595-9124f3094814 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Men are from Mars, and Women Too: A Bayesian Meta‐analysis of Overconfidence Experiments (2022)
Working Paper: Men Are from Mars, and Women Too: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Overconfidence Experiments (2022)
Working Paper: Men are from Mars and Women Too: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Overconfidence Experiments (2022)
Working Paper: Men are from Mars, and women too: a Bayesian meta-analysis of overconfidence experiments (2021)
Working Paper: Men are from Mars, and women too: a Bayesian meta-analysis of overconfidence experiments (2021)
Working Paper: Men Are from Mars, and Women Too: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Overconfidence Experiments (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:wpaper:957

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Pouliquen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).