Student Sorting and Bias in Value Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables

Jesse Rothstein

No 1054, Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies.

Abstract: Non-random assignment of students to teachers can bias value added estimates of teachers' causal effects. Rothstein (2008) shows that typical value added models indicate large counter-factual effects of 5th grade teachers on students' 4th grade learning, implying that assignments do not satisfy the imposed assumptions. This paper quantifies the resulting biases in estimates of 5th grade teachers' causal effects from several value added models, under varying assumptions about the assignment process. Under selection on observables, models for gain scores without controls or with only a single lagged score control are subject to important bias, but models with controls for the full test score history are nearly free of bias. I consider several scenarios for selection on unobservables, using the across-classroom variance of observed variables to calibrate each. Results indicate that even well-controlled models may be substantially biased, with the magnitude of the bias depending on the amount of information available for use in classroom assignments.

JEL-codes: H75 I21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-06
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://gceps.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/170rothstein.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: Student Sorting and Bias in Value-Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables (2009)
Working Paper: Student sorting and bias in value added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables (2009)
Working Paper: Student Sorting and Bias in Value Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:cepsud:170

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bobray Bordelon ().