Student sorting and bias in value added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables
Jesse Rothstein
No 14666, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
Non-random assignment of students to teachers can bias value added estimates of teachers' causal effects. Rothstein (2008a, b) shows that typical value added models indicate large counter-factual effects of 5th grade teachers on students' 4th grade learning, indicating that classroom assignments are far from random. This paper quantifies the resulting biases in estimates of 5th grade teachers' causal effects from several value added models, under varying assumptions about the assignment process. If assignments are assumed to depend only on observables, the most commonly used specifications are subject to important bias but other feasible specifications are nearly free of bias. I also consider the case where assignments depend on unobserved variables. I use the across-classroom variance of observables to calibrate several models of the sorting process. Results indicate that even the best feasible value added models may be substantially biased, with the magnitude of the bias depending on the amount of information available for use in classroom assignments.
JEL-codes: C12 C52 I21 J33 J45 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-lab and nep-ure
Note: ED LS
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (88)
Published as Jesse Rothstein, 2009. "Student Sorting and Bias in Value-Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 4(4), pages 537-571, October.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w14666.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Student Sorting and Bias in Value Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables (2008) 
Working Paper: Student Sorting and Bias in Value Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables (2008) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:14666
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w14666
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().