EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Student Sorting and Bias in Value-Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables

Jesse Rothstein

Education Finance and Policy, 2009, vol. 4, issue 4, 537-571

Abstract: Nonrandom assignment of students to teachers can bias value-added estimates of teachers' causal effects. Rothstein (2008, 2010) shows that typical value-added models indicate large counterfactual effects of fifth-grade teachers on students' fourth-grade learning, indicating that classroom assignments are far from random. This article quantifies the resulting biases in estimates of fifth-grade teachers' causal effects from several value-added models, under varying assumptions about the assignment process. If assignments are assumed to depend only on observables, the most commonly used specifications are subject to important bias, but other feasible specifications are nearly free of bias. I also consider the case in which assignments depend on unobserved variables. I use the across-classroom variance of observables to calibrate several models of the sorting process. Results indicate that even the best feasible value-added models may be substantially biased, with the magnitude of the bias depending on the amount of information available for use in classroom assignments. © 2009 American Education Finance Association

Keywords: value-added estimation; student sorting; bias; classroom assignments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I20 I21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (69)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/edfp.2009.4.4.537 (application/pdf)
Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Student sorting and bias in value added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables (2009) Downloads
Working Paper: Student Sorting and Bias in Value Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables (2008) Downloads
Working Paper: Student Sorting and Bias in Value Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:4:y:2009:i:4:p:537-571

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=1557-3060

Access Statistics for this article

Education Finance and Policy is currently edited by Stephanie Riegg Cellini and Randall Reback

More articles in Education Finance and Policy from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:4:y:2009:i:4:p:537-571