Student Sorting and Bias in Value-Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables
Jesse Rothstein
Education Finance and Policy, 2009, vol. 4, issue 4, 537-571
Abstract:
Nonrandom assignment of students to teachers can bias value-added estimates of teachers' causal effects. Rothstein (2008, 2010) shows that typical value-added models indicate large counterfactual effects of fifth-grade teachers on students' fourth-grade learning, indicating that classroom assignments are far from random. This article quantifies the resulting biases in estimates of fifth-grade teachers' causal effects from several value-added models, under varying assumptions about the assignment process. If assignments are assumed to depend only on observables, the most commonly used specifications are subject to important bias, but other feasible specifications are nearly free of bias. I also consider the case in which assignments depend on unobserved variables. I use the across-classroom variance of observables to calibrate several models of the sorting process. Results indicate that even the best feasible value-added models may be substantially biased, with the magnitude of the bias depending on the amount of information available for use in classroom assignments. © 2009 American Education Finance Association
Keywords: value-added estimation; student sorting; bias; classroom assignments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I20 I21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (69)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/edfp.2009.4.4.537 (application/pdf)
Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Student sorting and bias in value added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables (2009) 
Working Paper: Student Sorting and Bias in Value Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables (2008) 
Working Paper: Student Sorting and Bias in Value Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables (2008) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:4:y:2009:i:4:p:537-571
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=1557-3060
Access Statistics for this article
Education Finance and Policy is currently edited by Stephanie Riegg Cellini and Randall Reback
More articles in Education Finance and Policy from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().