The Distribution of Talent across Contests
Ghazala Azmat and
Marc Möller ()
No 789, Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance
Abstract:
Do the contests with the largest prizes attract the most-able contestants? To what extent do contestants avoid competition? In this paper, we show, theoretically and empirically, that the distribution of abilities plays a crucial role in determining contest choice. Complete sorting exists only when the proportion of high-ability contestants is sufficiently small. As this proportion increases, high-ability contestants shy away from competition and sorting decreases, such that, reverse sorting becomes a possibility. We test our theoretical predictions with a large panel data set containing contest choice over twenty years. We use exogenous variation in the participation of highly-able competitors to provide empirical evidence for the relationship among prizes, competition, and sorting.
Keywords: Contests; Competition; Sorting; Incentives (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D02 L20 M52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-03-30
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.qmul.ac.uk/sef/media/econ/research/wor ... 2016/items/wp789.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: The Distribution of Talent Across Contests (2018) 
Working Paper: The Distribution of Talent Across Contests (2018) 
Working Paper: The Distribution of Talent across Contests (2015) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:789
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nicholas Owen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).