The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels

Bert Weijters, Elke Cabooter, N. Schillewaert and -
Additional contact information
-: -

Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium from Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration

Abstract: Questionnaires using Likert-type rating scales are an important source of data in marketing research. Researchers use different rating scale formats with varying number of response categories and varying label formats (e.g., seven point rating scales labeled at the endpoints, fully labeled five point scales…), but have few guidelines when selecting a specific format. Drawing from the response style literature, we formulate hypotheses on the effect of the labeling of response categories and the number of response categories on net acquiescence response style, extreme response style and misresponse to reversed items. We test the hypotheses in an online survey (N=1207) with eight experimental conditions and a follow-up study with two experimental conditions (N = 226). We find evidence of strong effects of scale format on response distributions and misresponse to reversed items and formulate recommendations on scale format choice

Pages: 60 pages
Date: 2010-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mkt
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (59)

Downloads: (external link)
http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_10_636.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels (2010)
Working Paper: The effect of rating scale format on response styles: the number of response categories and response catgory labels (2010)
Working Paper: The effect of rating scale format on response styles: the number of response categories and response category labels (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rug:rugwps:10/636

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium from Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nathalie Verhaeghe ().