Does Losing Lead to Winning? An Empirical Analysis for Four Different Sports
Bouke Klein Teeselink,
Martijn J. van den Assem and
Dennie van Dolder
Additional contact information
Bouke Klein Teeselink: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Martijn J. van den Assem: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dennie van Dolder: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
No 20-049/IV, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute
Berger and Pope (2011) show that being slightly behind increases the likelihood of winning in professional and collegiate basketball. We extend their analysis to large samples of Australian football, American football and rugby matches, but find little to no evidence of such an effect for these three sports. When we revisit the phenomenon for basketball, we do find supportive evidence for National Basketball Association (NBA) matches from the period analyzed in Berger and Pope. However, we find no significant effect for NBA matches from outside this sample period, for collegiate matches, and for matches from the Women's NBA. High-powered meta-analyses across the different sports and competitions do not reject the null hypothesis of no effect of being slightly behind on winning.
Keywords: competition; motivation; performance; regression discontinuity design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Z20 D01 D91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-spo
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20200049
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().