The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments

Louis Lippens, Siel Vermeiren and Stijn Baert

No 972, GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO)

Abstract: Notwithstanding the improved integration of various minority groups in the workforce, unequal treatment in hiring still hinders many individuals' access to the labour market. To tackle this inaccessibility, it is essential to know which and to what extent minority groups face hiring discrimination. Past meta-studies have charted parts of the discrimination literature but permit only limited comparisons across minority groups. This meta-analysis synthesises a quasi-exhaustive register of correspondence experiments on hiring discrimination published between 2005 and 2020. Using a random-effects model, we computed pooled discrimination ratios concerning a total of ten discrimination grounds upon which unequal treatment in hiring is forbidden under United States federal or state law. First, we find that hiring discrimination against candidates with disabilities, older candidates, and less physically attractive candidates is at least equally severe as the unequal treatment of candidates with salient racial or ethnic characteristics. Remarkably, hiring discrimination against older applicants is even higher in Europe than in the United States. Furthermore, unequal treatment in hiring based on sexual orientation seems to be prompted mainly by signalling activism through an affiliation with an LGB+ rights organisation rather than same-sex orientation in itself. Last, hiring discrimination remains pervasive. Aside from a decrease in hiring discrimination based on race and national origin in Europe, we find no structural evidence of temporal changes in hiring discrimination based on the various other grounds within the scope of this review.

Keywords: hiring discrimination; unequal treatment; meta-analysis; correspondence experiment; audit study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J14 J15 J16 J23 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc, nep-exp and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/244614/1/GLO-DP-0972.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments (2023)
Working Paper: The State of Hiring Discrimination: A Meta-Analysis of (Almost) All Recent Correspondence Experiments (2021)
Working Paper: The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:glodps:972

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GLO Discussion Paper Series from Global Labor Organization (GLO) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().